Labor market data: 9 sources and APIs compared (2026)
BLS, JOLTS, FRED, Indeed Hiring Lab, Lightcast, LinkUp, Revelio, and raw job-postings APIs - what each labor market data source actually measures, how fresh it is, what it costs, and which one fits your use case.
Dvir Atias
Founder, JobsPipe
Labor market data comes in two fundamentally different shapes. Official statistics - government surveys like the BLS jobs report - are rigorous, free, and one to two months behind reality. Postings-derived data - built from the job ads companies publish - is real-time, granular to a single company, and either expensive or do-it-yourself. Most confusion about “where do I get labor market data” dissolves once you know which shape your problem needs.
Here are the nine sources that cover the field in 2026, what each actually measures, and which one fits which job.
Official statistics: the survey-based sources
- BLS Current Population Survey (CPS) - the monthly household survey behind the unemployment rate. The benchmark for labor-force participation and employment levels. Free, monthly, aggregated to demographics and geography.
- BLS JOLTS - the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey: openings, hires, quits, and layoffs by industry. The official measure of labor demand. Free, monthly, with roughly a one-month publication lag and industry-level granularity only.
- BLS OEWS - Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics: employment and wage distributions for 800+ occupations. The wage benchmark. Free, but annual - useless for anything moving quarter to quarter.
- FRED - the St. Louis Fed’s aggregator. Not a primary source, but the most convenient API for official series: one key, thousands of labor series, clean JSON.
Use these when you need methodological rigor, long time series, or numbers a policy or research audience will accept. Their structural limits: publication lag measured in months, aggregation that stops at industry or occupation level, and no visibility into any individual company.
Postings-derived data: the real-time sources
- Indeed Hiring Lab - free published indexes of posting volume by sector and country, built from Indeed’s own listings. Great for trend charts; you get their aggregates, not the underlying postings.
- LinkedIn Economic Graph - published workforce reports and hiring-rate data from LinkedIn’s network. Similar deal: useful aggregates, no raw data access for most organizations.
- Lightcast - the enterprise standard for postings analytics (formed from Emsi and Burning Glass). Deep occupation and skill taxonomies over decades of collected postings. Sales-led, typically five-to-six-figure annual contracts.
- LinkUp and Revelio Labs - postings and workforce datasets sold primarily to investors and corporate strategy teams. LinkUp indexes jobs directly from employer sites; Revelio models workforce flows from public profiles and postings. Both sales-led.
- Raw job-postings APIs - the build-your-own tier. Instead of buying someone’s aggregates, you pull the postings themselves - per company, per role, per day - and compute exactly the metric your product needs.
Which source for which job
- Academic or policy research - BLS and FRED. The lag is acceptable; the methodology is the point.
- Market sizing and skills taxonomy work - Lightcast if the budget exists; OEWS for the free wage baseline.
- Investment signals - LinkUp or Revelio, which are shaped (and priced) for that buyer.
- Trend content and dashboards - Indeed Hiring Lab and Economic Graph aggregates are free and citable.
- Products and GTM workflows - anything that needs company-level, current-week data (who is hiring, for what, right now) needs raw postings. Aggregates cannot answer per-company questions, and official statistics are structurally too slow.
Building on raw postings data
The raw-postings tier used to mean running your own scrapers across thousands of career sites. That is the layer JobsPipe’s jobs API replaces: postings from 30+ ATS and job-board sources - Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, and the rest - normalized into one schema, refreshed within 24 hours, with structured salary, resolved locations, cross-source dedup, and webhooks on new postings. It is the same upstream data the commercial analytics vendors collect, exposed as an API you can build on directly. Our job posting API post covers the data model in detail.
Build your own labor-market metrics on raw postings - free tier, API key in 30 seconds.
Get a free API keyFrequently Asked Questions
Where can I get labor market data for free?
BLS and FRED are the main free sources of labor market data. The BLS Current Population Survey is the monthly household survey behind the unemployment rate, JOLTS covers openings, hires, quits, and layoffs by industry, and OEWS covers wages for 800+ occupations annually. FRED aggregates thousands of official labor series behind one key with clean JSON. Indeed Hiring Lab and the LinkedIn Economic Graph publish free postings-derived aggregates too.
What is the difference between official labor statistics and job postings data?
Official statistics are survey-based, rigorous, free, and one to two months behind reality, while postings-derived data is real-time and granular down to a single company but either expensive or do-it-yourself. BLS series aggregate to industry or occupation level and give no visibility into any individual employer. Postings can answer per-company questions, which is why products and GTM workflows need them and research work does not.
What is the best labor market data source for tracking which companies are hiring?
Raw job postings are the only source that answers per-company hiring questions. Aggregates from Indeed Hiring Lab and the LinkedIn Economic Graph give you sector trends rather than employers, and BLS series stop at industry level with a publication lag measured in months. Lightcast, LinkUp, and Revelio Labs sell postings analytics but are all sales-led. JobsPipe exposes postings from 30+ ATS and job-board sources as an API you query directly.

