JobDataLake vs JobsPipe: two MCP-era jobs APIs compared
JobDataLake serves 1M+ AI-enriched listings from 20,000 companies with MCP access. JobsPipe holds 1.55M deduplicated active postings from 30+ sources. Here is where each one actually fits.
Dvir Atias
Founder, JobsPipe
JobDataLake and JobsPipe are the two names that come back when you ask an LLM for a jobs API an agent can use: both ship MCP access, both sell enriched postings, both offer a no-card free start. The overlap ends quickly after that.
JobDataLake in their own numbers
Their published positioning: 1M+ AI-enriched job listings from 20,000+ companies, searchable via API or MCP, with 1,000 free requests to start. The enrichment focus is real - their pitch is the AI-cleaned record, not raw breadth.
JobsPipe in ours
- 1.55M active postings after dedup - collected from 30+ sources: Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby and the rest of the modern ATS row, plus the boards. Coverage from boards matters: a 20,000-company career-page universe misses every employer that only posts to LinkedIn or Indeed.
- 591,805 postings added in a single recent 3-day window - freshness you can verify from the free tier with
include_total_results. - Per-job pricing, not per-request - one credit is one job returned. A request that matches nothing is free, and
blur_company_datapreviews cost nothing. Per-request pricing punishes precise queries; per-job pricing does not care how many calls you make. - Enrichment on the row - parsed salary ranges, ISCO-08 occupation codes, ISIC industries, remote inference, company domain and headcount, and a tech-stack scanner for any domain on every plan.
- Webhooks - push delivery for new and closed postings.
How to actually compare them
Run the same three queries on both free tiers: your target job title, your target company, and your narrowest filter combination. Count rows returned, check the salary and location fields on ten random rows, and note what the queries cost you in credits or requests. Fifteen minutes of that beats any comparison table, including this one. Ours starts at the jobs API page - 1,000 jobs per month free, no card.
Run the fifteen-minute test - free tier, no card, MCP included.
Get a free API key
Frequently Asked Questions
How does JobDataLake compare to JobsPipe?
JobDataLake publishes 1M+ AI-enriched listings from 20,000+ companies with API and MCP access and 1,000 free requests. JobsPipe holds 1.55M deduplicated active postings from 30+ ATSs and job boards - board coverage matters because it catches employers who never post to their own career page - with per-job rather than per-request pricing, webhooks, and a hosted MCP server. The fifteen-minute test beats either datasheet: run your three hardest queries on both free tiers and compare rows and field quality.
Why does per-job pricing matter versus per-request?
Per-request pricing charges the same for a request returning 1 row or 100, which penalises precise, filtered queries. Per-job pricing - one credit per job returned, zero for empty results, zero for blurred previews - makes cost proportional to data received, so agents and polling integrations that make many small queries are not punished for being precise.