# JobsPipe vs Fantastic.jobs > Both are jobs APIs for developers. Fantastic.jobs goes wide on raw scale; JobsPipe goes deep on per-source normalization. Here’s where each fits. **Canonical URL:** https://jobspipe.dev/alternatives/fantastic-jobs **Competitor domain:** https://fantastic.jobs ## What Fantastic.jobs is Fantastic.jobs is the closest direct competitor to JobsPipe in positioning. They market a jobs API aggregating 200,000+ career sites plus LinkedIn (over 10M jobs per month) across 100+ countries with hourly refresh. They distribute through their own site plus the RapidAPI and Apify marketplaces, where they report 5,000+ subscribers. Their positioning emphasizes speed (new career sites onboarded “in under 2 hours”) and AI enrichment of postings. The target audience is identical to ours: job-board builders, ATS-integration teams, resume/job-search product makers, lead-gen services, and AI startups needing training data. ## Fantastic.jobs pricing $45/month entry tier (under 200k jobs/month). $200-$4,000/month enterprise tiers. Free trial available. ## Fantastic.jobs target buyer Job board builders, ATS integrators, resume/job-search product makers, lead-gen, AI startups - the same B2B-developer audience JobsPipe serves. ## Where Fantastic.jobs wins - Raw scale of postings. 200,000+ career sites and 10M+ jobs/month is more aggregate volume than we currently claim. - Onboarding speed for new sources. They advertise getting a new career site from request to API in under two hours. - Marketplace distribution. They’re on RapidAPI and Apify, which makes them discoverable for devs who default to those marketplaces for API shopping. - LinkedIn jobs included. They surface LinkedIn-mirrored postings directly. We deliberately go upstream to the underlying ATS instead. ## Where JobsPipe wins - Per-source explicit schema. Every JobsPipe source has its own documented page at /sources/[ats] describing exactly what we cover, how we cover it, and what the response shape looks like. You can scope a query to one ATS or exclude one. - Legal-posture clarity. We go upstream to the ATS where the job was first posted, not to LinkedIn (which has thorny ToS / hiQ-Labs case-law issues for scraped data). - Self-serve free tier. Monthly credits to evaluate the API before paying, with an API key in 30 seconds. - Documentation depth. We publish per-source technical writeups explaining how Workday vs Greenhouse vs Lever differ. That depth signals long-term ownership of the integration layer. ## Side-by-side comparison | Axis | Fantastic.jobs | JobsPipe | |---|---|---| | Pricing entry | $45/mo, free trial | $0 free tier, $49/mo paid | | Raw posting volume | 10M+ jobs/month | Aggregate not yet claimed - per-source breakdown instead | | ATS source count | 200k+ career sites bulk | 50+ named ATS sources, each documented | | LinkedIn coverage | Yes, direct | No - upstream ATS only (legal clarity) | | Refresh cadence | Hourly (claimed) | 6h on hot tenants, 24h elsewhere | | Marketplace presence | Own site + RapidAPI + Apify | Direct API only | | Per-source filtering | Aggregator-style | ?source=greenhouse, ?source=workday, etc. | ## When to pick which **Pick Fantastic.jobs:** You need maximum raw posting volume, want LinkedIn-mirrored postings included, or prefer billing through RapidAPI or Apify. **Pick JobsPipe:** You want explicit per-source control, prefer the legal clarity of upstream-ATS-only data, or value documentation depth. ## FAQ ### How is JobsPipe different from Fantastic.jobs? Same shape (developer-focused jobs API, similar pricing tiers, similar audience). The differences are: we expose per-source schema explicitly (you query ?source=greenhouse), we go upstream to ATSs rather than mirroring from LinkedIn, and we ship deeper per-source documentation. ### Does JobsPipe cover as many career sites as Fantastic.jobs? Not on a raw count basis - they claim 200,000+ aggregated. JobsPipe focuses on 50+ named ATSs that we document and normalize individually. Different coverage philosophy: bulk discovery vs. quality-curated per source. ### Does JobsPipe include LinkedIn job postings? Not directly. We go upstream to where each job was first posted (the company’s ATS - Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, etc.). Most jobs that appear on LinkedIn started life on an ATS we cover. Read /sources/linkedin for the longer reasoning around LinkedIn ToS and the hiQ Labs case. ### Can I migrate from Fantastic.jobs to JobsPipe? Yes. The JSON shapes are similar enough that a schema mapping is straightforward. The main migration consideration is the LinkedIn-mirrored postings they include that we explicitly don’t - if those are load-bearing for your product, evaluate the upstream-ATS coverage gap before switching. ## Related - **Product:** https://jobspipe.dev/jobs-api - **All alternatives:** https://jobspipe.dev/alternatives - **Intent data providers (comparison hub):** https://jobspipe.dev/intent-data-providers - **Sign up (free tier):** https://jobspipe.dev/signup --- Generated from structured data. View the rendered page at https://jobspipe.dev/alternatives/fantastic-jobs.